NounSingular population Plural populations population (plural populations)
Derived terms
Related termsFrom Wiktionary under the GNU Free Documentation License. In biology, a population is the collection of inter-breeding organisms of a particular species; in sociology, a collection of human beings. Individuals within a population share a factor may be reduced by statistical means, but such a generalization may be too vague to imply anything. Demography is used extensively in marketing, which relates to economic units, such as retailers, to potential customers. For example, a coffee shop that wants to sell to a younger audience looks at the demographics of an area to be able to appeal to this younger audience. World populationMain article: World populationAccording to papers published by the United States Census Bureau, the world population hit 6.5 billion (6,500,000,000) on February 24, 2006. The United Nations Population Fund designated October 12, 1999 as the approximate day on which world population reached 6 billion. This was about 12 years after world population reached 5 billion in 1987, and 6 years after world population reached 5.5 billion in 1993. However, the population of some countries, such as Nigeria and China is not even known to the nearest million, so there is a considerable margin of error in such estimates. Population growth increased significantly as the Industrial Revolution gathered pace from 1700 onwards. The last 50 years have seen a yet more rapid increase in the rate of population growth due to medical advances and substantial increases in agricultural productivity, particularly in the period 1960 to 1995 made by the Green Revolution. In 2007 the United Nations Population Division projected that the world's population will likely surpass 10 billion in 2055. In the future, world population has been expected to reach a peak of growth, from there it will decline due to economic reasons, health concerns, land exhaustion and environmental hazards. There is around an 85% chance that the world's population will stop growing before the end of the century. There is a 60% probability that the world's population will not exceed 10 billion people before 2100, and around a 15% probability that the world's population at the end of the century will be lower than it is today. For different regions, the date and size of the peak population will vary considerably. Population controlMain article: Population controlPopulation control is the practice of curtailing population increase, usually by reducing the birth rate. Surviving records from Ancient Greece document the first known examples of population control. These include the colonization movement, which saw Greek outposts being built across the Mediterranean and Black Sea basins to accommodate the excess population of individual states. Infanticide and abortion were encouraged in some Greek city states in order to keep population down. An important example of mandated population control is People's Republic of China's one-child policy, in which having more than one child is made extremely unattractive. This has led to allegations that practices like forced abortions, forced sterilization, and infanticide are used as a result of the policy. The country's sex ratio at birth of 114 boys to 100 girls may be evidence that the latter is often sex-selective. However, other countries without a one-child policy also have similar sex ratios but for different reasons such as nutrition. It is helpful to distinguish between fertility control as individual decision-making and population control as a governmental or state-level policy of regulating population growth. Fertility control may occur when individuals or couples or families take steps to decrease or to regulate the timing of their own child-bearing. In Ansley Coale's oft-cited formulation, three preconditions for a sustained decline in fertility are: (1) acceptance of calculated choice (as opposed to fate or chance or divine will) as a valid element in fertility, (2) perceived advantages from reduced fertility, and (3) knowledge and mastery of effective techniques of control. In contrast to a society with natural fertility, a society that desires to limit fertility and has the means to do so may use those means to delay childbearing, space childbearing, or stop childbearing. Delaying sexual intercourse (or marriage), or the adoption of natural or artificial means of contraception are most often an individual or family decision, not a matter of a state policy or societal-wide sanctions. On the other hand, individuals who assume some sense of control over their own fertility can also accelerate the frequency or success of child-bearing through planning. At the societal level, declining fertility is almost an inevitable result of growing secular education of women. However, the exercise of moderate to high levels of fertility control does not necessarily imply low fertility rates. Even among societies that exercise substantial fertility control, societies with an equal ability to exercise fertility control (to determine how many children to have and when to bear them) may display widely different levels of fertility (numbers of children borne) associated with individual and cultural preferences for the number of children or size of families. In contrast to fertility control, which is mainly an individual-level decision, governments may attempt to exercise population control by increasing access to means of contraception or by other population policies and programs. The idea of "population control" as a governmental or societal-level regulation of population growth does not require "fertility control" in the sense that it has been defined above, since a state can affect the growth of a society's population even if that society practices little fertility control. It's also important to embrace policies favoring population increase as an aspect of population control, and not to assume that states want to control population only by limiting its growth. To stimulate population growth, governments may support not only immigration but also pronatalist policies such as tax benefits, financial awards, paid work leaves, and childcare to encourage the bearing of additional children. Such policies have been pursued in recent years in France and Sweden, for example. With the same goal of increasing population growth, on occasion governments have sought to limit the use of abortion or modern means of birth control. An example was Romania's 1966 ban on access to contraception and abortion on demand. In ecology, population control is on occasions considered to be done solely by predators, diseases, parasites, and environmental factors. In a constant environment, population control is regulated by the availability of food, water, and safety. The maximum number of a species or individuals that can be supported in a certain area is called the carrying capacity. At many times human effects on animal and plant populations are also considered. Migrations of animals may be seen as a natural way of population control, for the food on land is more abundant on some seasons. The area of the migrations' start is left to reproduce the food supply for large mass of animals next time around. See also immigration. India is another example where the government has taken measures to reduce the country’s population. Concerns that the rapidly growing population would adversely affect economic growth and living standards caused India to implement an official family planning program in the late 1950s and early 1960s; it was the first country in the world to do so. From Wikipedia under the
GNU Free Documentation License Population Connection: More money for family planning in 2010?
Population Connection hu, 18 Jun 2009 18:45:00 GM Nita Lowey (D-NY), allocated $648 million for family planning and reproductive health care, including $60 million for the United Nations . Population. Fund (UNFPA). This amount is significantly higher than President Obama's budget request ... Population Connection: 300 Million Suffer More to Come
Population Connection Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:36:00 GM places on earth where there will be a need for vast increases in aid. I would only add that these are, for the most part, the same places which have the most rapid . population. growth. Posted by . Population. Connection at 2:36 PM ... New Mexico universities prepare for population growth, increased ...
unknown Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:00:00 GM More than 6000 people are projected to move to the corridor between Belen and Santa Fe within the next twenty-five years, Dekker said. This unprecedented . population. growth will have a huge impact on the development of UNM. ... From Google Blog Search: "population" China's Migrant 'Floating Population '
Seeking Alpha The floating population is a major force fueling the country's rapid economic growth. Having made China one of the largest export economies in the world, ... and more » wsaz charleston poll: Declining Population , Pension Fund Major ...
WSAZ-TV Charleston's declining population also poses a big problem for the city, according to five other councilman. According to the latest census, 50302 people ... Leier column: Never too soon to think about goose hunting
In-Forum The population gradually increased to more than 2000 in 1993, then Mother Nature stepped in with abundant rain and snow that put water back into thousands ... and more » From Google News Search: "population" constricted population jpg
887px x 550px | 218.20kB [source page] An Expanding Population A Constricted Population From Yahoo Image Search: "population" What percentage of the population preys upon the misfortune of others? To make money off of them? Q. Does this trait come out in everyone or is it less the 50% of the population? I always thought that we should help the unfortunate and those in need myself. Have I been mislead? Is that not the norm? Asked by Dawn - Mon Jul 6 02:46:57 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments What would the population equal from the start of evolution and would it make evolution untrue? Q. If you calculate population from 500,000 years ago the population today should equal a lot higher population so how can evolution stand true if it accured so long ago Asked by jshleejsh - Sat Nov 8 19:04:11 2008 - - 8 Answers - 0 Comments A. This is an old, lame argument sometimes called "the bunny blunder." It's been soundly debunked enough times so that any individual or any website still supporting it can immediately be labeled as spurious and deceptive. "[The] population argument fails on many different criteria. Honest creationists should eschew its use." Answered by don - Wed Nov 12 11:21:35 2008 How would reducing human population benefit the global environment?
Q. No, I'm not talking about war or killing anyone. I'm talking about sensible family planning where we strive for a goal of 1 child per family. (In 75 years, this would halve the human population to the levels we had in the 1940's). Deem, this is a question. If you say it can not benefit, then that is your answer. I'm trying to find out in what ways it can benefit. 006 - You can grow the economy by having more resources per person to use. Asked by skeptic - Mon Jan 14 16:50:29 2008 - - 8 Answers - 1 Comments A. We would consume fewer resources, take up less space, and pollute less. In short, our environmental impact would be much smaller. The problem is that our society is not in the correct mindset right now. Not too long ago there was a news story about a woman who had an abortion because she didn't want to have a child who would contribute to overpopulation and the consumption of natural resources, etc. Many people on Y!A mocked and insulted this decision for no good reason. Answered by Dana1981, Master of Science - Mon Jan 14 17:07:54 2008 From Yahoo Answer Search: "population" |





